My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Much better than expected.
I came across this book while browsing ghost hunting blogs online. It took me some time to “pull the trigger” as it were and actually check it out, but I am glad I did.
First off, I will say that I’m not going to take a stance on whether I believe the book to be factual or not. It seems plausible, assuming you’re the sort who believes in this sort of thing, but much of the second half seems to borrow heavily from the presentation tactics of The Amityville Horror, which has me wary. The jury’s out in my head, but if you’re looking for something that is 100% one way or the other, you won’t find it here.
The writing is clear enough and technically sound for the most part; there may be an overabundance of quotation marks in places italics or dashes would have been better choices, but not too jarring. The layout is nice, the pictures are crisp. Overall, a very nice looking book, which is always a bonus in my opinion.
So far as content, it’s an interesting story and reasonably well presented. My one gripe in this department – which can’t really be counted as one, if you believe the story to be true – is that at the halfway mark, most of the “investigative” bits disappear and it becomes an ongoing docudrama told mostly in Facebook messages. This wouldn’t necessarily be a problem, except that it differs significantly from the first half, and there are multiple references to “things” happening at home that are never really addressed or discussed, behind in the background in favor of the ongoing Messenger-related saga of “Vincent” and his mum. Were there more references or explanation of what was happening to the author and how those events might tie to the overall situation, I suspect this rating could easily have gone up to 4 stars.
One thing I appreciated was the cries of “B.S.” regarding the original poster’s description of Harold the Haunted Doll; in particular, pointing out the stupidity of the FBI having X-Rays (taken from photographs…) that prove there’s a dead baby inside the doll amused me. Whether a tactic to increase believability later or merely another page in a well-contemplated narrative, the early debunking works and sets your brain up to think “Well, he said THIS was most assuredly NOT true, so maybe that means this part COULD be…” It works well.
Lastly, I have to say: I’m well steeped in horror of all kinds. Most of it doesn’t bother me. Not even a twitch or a shudder. During the initial chapters of this book, however, I was severely freaked out. I couldn’t point to any single thing and say “This is why!” The whole tale just bothered me, leading to a coffee overdose and cartoon therapy. That dread and worry fades entering into the second half, but the ghost – pardon the pun – of the feeling lingered over the rest of the book.
All in all, I’d say it’s worth checking out. The only things missing for a higher rating would have been fewer “I knew something about this but I’m not going to tell you” moments and perhaps something to break up the Facebook monotony in the second half. A well done effort overall, though.